Landmark permit issued for 6 EAST 10TH STREET, MANHATTAN in Greenwich Village

Source
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Updated
No longer updated

More about this section…

This is a landmark building permit with a issue date of April 23, 2009.

Landmark building permit details

Location 6 EAST 10TH STREET, MANHATTAN
Issue date April 23, 2009
(?) COFA COFA 09-6682

Certificates of Appropriateness (COFAs) are issued by the landmarks commission when it approves such things as building construction, demolition and visible additions to historic property. The certificates require a public hearing and the entire process can take several months.

Docket 09-5855
Historic district Greenwich Village
Landmark name N/A
Expiration date September 23, 2014
Text
Pursuant to Section 25-307 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Landmarks Preservation
Commission, at the Public Meeting of September 23, 2008 following the Public Hearing of the same date, voted
to approve some of the proposed work at the subject premises, as put forward in your application completed on
August 14, 2008. This approval will expire on September 23, 2014.

The proposed work, as approved, consists of alterations at the non-visible roof, rear facade and in the rear yard,
including the demolition of an existing three story rear yard addition; demolition of third floor and penthouse rear
walls, and the construction of a four-story rear-yard addition, featuring brick cladding, steel multi-paned windows
and doors at the basement and parlor floors, a steel arbor and a cast iron balcony at the parlor level; multi-paned,
double-hung punched window openings at the second and third floors; and modifying the existing one-story
penthouse, featuring large panes of glass, an oval skylight and nine (9) HVAC units and steel dunnage at the roof
of the penthouse; as shown in existing conditions photographs; and drawings labeled L-1 through L-9, L-12
through L-17, prepared by Steven Harris Architects, LLP, submitted as components of the application, and
presented at the Public Hearing and Public Meeting.

In reviewing this proposal, the Commission noted that the Greenwich Village Historic District designation report
describes 6 East 10th Street as a Greek Revival style house built in 1848 and altered in the early twentieth
century; and that in terms of its style, scale, materials, and details, the building contributes to the special
architectural and historic character of the Greenwich Village Historic District.



With regard to this proposal, the Commission found that the demolition of the existing rear yard addition will not
remove any significant architectural features; that the proposed addition will not be visible from the any public
thoroughfare; that the proposed rear yard addition will not rise to the full height of the building and will therefore
retain the scale and character of this rowhouse; that the top floor of the rear wall will remain intact thereby
preserving historic fabric and the building's relationship to the row; that the addition will project less into the rear
yard than the other rear yard additions in the block and therefore will enhance the rear yard and the central
greenspace; and that the proposed work will not detract from the special architectural and historic character of the
Greenwich Village Historic District. Based on these findings, the Commission determined the proposed work to
be appropriate to the building and to the historic district, and voted to approve it.

However, in voting to grant this approval, the Commission stipulated that two final signed and sealed copies of
the Department of Buildings filing drawings for the approved work be submitted to the staff of the Commission
for review and approval.

Subsequently, on January 13, 2009, the Landmarks Preservation Commission received final drawings labeled
A0.0, A0.1, A0.3 through A0.9, A1.0 through A1.3, A2.0 and A3.0, dated revised December 16, 2008, all
prepared by Steven Harris, R.A., undated drawings labeled GN-1, D-I-D.V, prepared by Mikhail B. Gurvitch,
P.E., engineer's statement, dated March 12, 2009, prepared by Ross Albert Dalland, P.E. Accordingly, staff
reviewed the drawings and noted that the rooftop addition has been set back approximately two feet and enlarged
in height by approximately four feet, and found that the proposal approved by the Commission has been
maintained. Based on this and the above findings, the drawings are marked approved with a perforated seal, and
Certificate of Appropriateness 09-5855 is being issued.

This permit is issued on the basis of the building and site conditions described in the application and disclosed
during the review process. By accepting this permit, the applicant agrees to notify the Commission if the actual
building or site conditions vary or if original or historic building fabric is discovered. The Commission reserves
the right to amend or revoke this permit, upon written notice to the applicant, in the event that the actual building
or site conditions are materially different from those described in the application or disclosed during the review
process.

All approved drawings are marked approved by the Commission with a perforated seal indicating the date of
approval. The work is limited to what is contained in the perforated documents. Other work or amendments to
this filing must be reviewed and approved separately. The applicant is hereby put on notice that performing or
maintaining any work not explicitly authorized by this permit may make the applicant liable for criminal and/or
civil penalties, including imprisonment and fines. This letter constitutes the permit; a copy must be prominently
displayed at the site while work is in progress. Please direct inquiries to Mishael Shabrami.




Robert B. Tierney
Chair

PLEASE NOTE: PERFORATED DRAWINGS AND A COPY OF THIS PERMIT HAVE BEEN SENT TO:
Patrick Plunkett, Steven Harris Architects

cc: Patrick Plunkett, Steven Harris Architect; Jared Knowles, Deputy Director of Preservation/LPC




PAGE 2
Issued: 4/23/09
DOCKET: 09-5855

Added to EveryBlock on May 1, 2009.

Comments

Have something to add? Post a comment — No HTML, please.

Please stay respectful and on-topic, and follow our comment policy.