Landmark building permit details
| Location | 57 GREAT JONES STREET, MANHATTAN |
|---|---|
| Issue date | April 16, 2009 |
| (?) COFA | COFA 09-8736 |
Certificates of Appropriateness (COFAs) are issued by the landmarks commission when it approves such things as building construction, demolition and visible additions to historic property. The certificates require a public hearing and the entire process can take several months. |
|
| Docket | 09-4535 |
| Historic district | NOHO EXTENSION |
| Landmark name | N/A |
| Expiration date | March 10, 2015 |
| Text |
Pursuant to Section 25-307 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Landmarks Preservation Commission, at the Public Meeting of March 10, 2009, following the Public Hearing and Public Meeting of March 3, 2009, voted to approve a proposal to install new storefront infill and alter a barrier-free access ramp, as put forward in your application completed on February 5, 2009. This approval will expire on March 10, 2015. The proposed work, as approved, consists of the removal of a non-historic storefront, a non-historic metal and glass canopy, and non-historic light fixtures, and the installation of new glass storefront infill with sliding metal security panels that, when the storefront is open, will collapse to an area symmetrical with the existing brick pier to the west of the storefront opening; the removal of an existing barrier free access ramp and the construction of a new barrier free access ramp in the reverse direction; the removal of a non-historic menu box and its replacement with signage; and the installation of a new security camera; as shown on existing and historic photographs, and presentation boards A 001, A 002, A 003, and A 004, dated 2/23/09, prepared by Robert Strong, submitted as components of the application, and presented at the March 3, 2009 Public Hearing, and presentation boards A 001, A 002, A 003, and A 004, dated 3/5/09, prepared by Robert Strong, submitted as components of the application, and presented at the March 10, 2009 Public Meeting. The proposal, as originally presented, included the installation of sliding security panels that, when the storefront is open, collapsed to the westernmost portion of the storefront opening. In reviewing this proposal, the Commission noted that the NoHo Historic District Extension designation report describes 57 Great Jones Street as an altered Romanesque Revival style stable building, built c. 1860-1868; and that the building's style, scale, materials, and details are among the features that contribute to the special architectural and historic character of the NoHo Historic District Extension. With regard to the proposal, the Commission found that the removal of the existing storefront, metal and glass canopy, light fixtures, and menu box will not eliminate any historic fabric and will remove clutter from the façade; that the proposed glass storefront and metal sliding security panels will be installed within a highly altered portion of the façade and will not detract from the historic fabric at the upper floors of the building; that the clean and minimalist design will relate well to the façade of this altered former carriage house which has been stripped of its details; that the transparency of the storefront infill and the sliding metal panels will recall the historic alterations of buildings of this type within the NoHo Historic District Extension for garage, automotive, and industrial purposes; that the location of the sliding metal panels in the open position will evoke the historic presence of a masonry pier; that the entrance door and display windows will relate to the symmetry of the historic fenestration at the second floor; that the reversal of the barrier-free access ramp will maintain its minimal appearance within the streetscape and will not detract from the historic character of the building and historic district; that the new sign panel will be installed in an area of plain masonry, anchored in the mortar joints, and in a location that relates to the storefront opening; that the new sign panel will not detract from any significant architectural features of the building; and that the new security camera will be of a modest size and its installation will not result in any damage to, or detract from any significant architectural features of the building. Based on these findings, the Commission determined the proposed work to be appropriate to the building and the Historic District, and voted to approve it. The Commission authorized the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness upon receipt, review, and approval of final signed and sealed Department of Buildings filing drawings for the approved work. Subsequently, on March 18, 2009, the Landmarks Preservation Commission received final drawing A-004.00, dated 1/20/09, drawings A-004.01, A-004.02, A-004.03, A-005.00, and A-010.00, dated 1/3/09, and drawings A-001.00, A-006.00, and A-008.00, dated 1/21/08, all prepared by Robert Strong, R.A. Staff reviewed these drawings and found that the approved work has been maintained. In addition, staff noted the inclusion of the following additional work: interior alterations at the cellar, first, and second floors; repainting the façade gray (Benjamin Moore HC-170 "Stonington Gray"); painting the existing residential entrance door black; and the construction of a non-visible mechanical bulkhead at the rear of the roof. With regard to the additional work, the Commission finds that the façade will be repainted with the same color, and that this work constitutes routine maintenance of the building. The Commission also finds that painting the non-historic residential entry door black is in keeping with the color of entrances in buildings of this style and age. The Commission finally finds, in accordance with the Rules of the City of New York, Title 63, Section 2-19(e)(1), that the mechanical bulkhead will consist solely of mechanical equipment; that its construction will not result in damage to, or demolition of, a significant architectural feature of the roof; that it will not be visible from a public thoroughfare; and that it will not adversely affect significant architectural features of adjacent improvements. Accordingly, staff reviewed the drawings and found that the proposal approved by the Commission has been maintained. Based on this and the above findings, the drawings are marked approved with a perforated seal, and Certificate of Appropriateness 09-8736 is being issued. This permit is issued on the basis of the building and site conditions described in the application and disclosed during the review process. By accepting this permit, the applicant agrees to notify the Commission if the actual building or site conditions vary or if original or historic building fabric is discovered. The Commission reserves the right to amend or revoke this permit, upon written notice to the applicant, in the event that the actual building or site conditions are materially different from those described in the application or disclosed during the review process. All approved drawings are marked approved by the Commission with a perforated seal indicating the date of approval. The work is limited to what is contained in the perforated documents. Other work or amendments to this filing must be reviewed and approved separately. The applicant is hereby put on notice that performing or maintaining any work not explicitly authorized by this permit may make the applicant liable for criminal and/or civil penalties, including imprisonment and fines. This letter constitutes the permit; a copy must be prominently displayed at the site while work is in progress. Please direct inquiries to Timothy Shaw. PAGE 2 Issued: 4/16/09 DOCKET: 09-4535 Robert B. Tierney Chair PLEASE NOTE: PERFORATED DRAWINGS AND A COPY OF THIS PERMIT HAVE BEEN SENT TO: Robert Strong, Robert Strong Architect cc: R. Strong; C. Kane Levy, Deputy Director of Preservation, LPC PAGE 3 Issued: 4/16/09 DOCKET: 09-4535 |
Added to EveryBlock on May 1, 2009.
Comments
Other landmark building permits nearby
- Manhattan
- Precinct 9
- Manhattan CB 2
- 10003
- State Assembly District 66
- State Senate District 29
- Congressional District 8
- City Council District 1
- More landmark building permits in New York City
- Subscribe to e-mail updates nearby:
