Landmark permit issued for 3 MITCHELL PLACE, MANHATTAN

Landmark building permit details

Location 3 MITCHELL PLACE, MANHATTAN
Issue date March 26, 2008
(?) COFA COFA 08-7433

Certificates of Appropriateness (COFAs) are issued by the landmarks commission when it approves such things as building construction, demolition and visible additions to historic property. The certificates require a public hearing and the entire process can take several months.

Docket 08-6265
Historic district N/A
Landmark name PANHELLENIC TOWER (NOW BEEKMAN TOWER HOTEL)
Expiration date March 26, 2014
Text Pursuant to Section 25-307 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Landmarks Preservation
Commission, at the Public Meeting of January 8, 2008, following the Public Hearing of the same date, voted to
approve a proposal for work at the subject premises, as put forward in your application completed on October 17,
2007, and as you were informed in Status Update Letter 08-6277, issued on January 24, 2008 (LPC #08-3125).
This approval will expire October 17, 2014.

The proposed work, as approved, consists of installing new through-the-wall AC units with rimless louvers,
painted Benjamin Moore 2165-30 "Golden Retriever" to match the existing brick; and painting existing louvers
installed prior to designation and previously approved louvers by the Landmarks Preservation Commission
Benjamin Moore 2165-30 "Golden Retriever" to match the existing brick. The existing louvers will be painted in
phases, as planned exterior restoration occurs. The proposal, as originally proposed, called for matching the
existing bronze aluminum AC louvers. The proposal was shown in historic photographs, existing condition
photos, and existing and proposed drawings, prepared by Paul Taylor, R.A., submitted as components of the
application and presented at the Public Hearing.

In reviewing this proposal, the Commision noted that the individual landmark designation report for Beekman
Hotel a.k.a. the Panhellenic Tower states that 3 Mitchell Place is an Art Deco style skyscraper designed by John
Mead Howells and built in 1927-8. The Commission further noted that the current louvers are bronze finished on
the central bays at the primary elevation and that probes beneath the louvers revealed damaged brick under the
flanges.

With regard to this proposal, the Commission found that the installation of through-the-wall air conditioners will
add to the numerous existing through-the-wall units exist, therefore, the proposal for new through-the-wall
HVAC units would have a minimal impact; that the through-the-wall HVAC units are set in recessed bays in
vertical rows in keeping with the verticality of the building; that the proposed louvers will be flush-mounted,
thereby minimizing their presence on the facade; and that the size and scale of the building will maintain its
sculptural mass and solidity. Based on these findings, the Commission determined the proposed work to be
appropriate to the building and the historic district, and voted to approve this application.

However, the Commission made its determination subject to the stipulation that the new through-the-wall air
conditioners have rimless, architectural louvers and will be painted to match the surrounding masonry and that
the existing and previously approved louvers be altered, in consultation with Landmarks Preservation Staff, in
order to blend with the surrouding masonry; and that two sets of signed and sealed DOB filing drawings, revised
to incorporate these changes, be submitted to the staff of the Commission.

Subsequently, on February 13, 2008, the Landmarks Preservation Commission received final drawings A6.8 and
A8.3, dated December 7, 2007, and drawings 2-5, dated August 21, 2007, all prepared by Paul D. Taylor, R.A.
and received a letter, prepared by Timothy B. Haskin, President of Peninsula Real Estate. Staff reviewed the
drawings and found that the work approved by the Commission has been maintained; and that the proposal has
been amended to include exterior work at the Mitchell Place elevation, including the installation of a non-visible
generator at the second floor roof on dunnage; at the fourth floor roof, the installation of a non-visible A/C; the
replacement of awnings at the ground floor level; the restoration of marble bulkhead at the western elevation; and
the repair of concrete steps. With regard to this proposed revisions, the Commission finds that the rooftop
additions consist solely of mechanical equipment; does not result in the damage to, or demolition of, a significant
architectural feature of the roof; is minimally visible from a public thoroughfare; and does not adversely affect
significant architectural features of adjacent improvements; the awnings must be retractable on individual
landmarks; have a straight slope; have side panels; have an unframed skirt that is proportional to the height and
size of the awning; does not hide, cause the loss of or damage to, any significant feature; installed at or directly
below the lintel or transom bar; length shall not exceed the length of the associated window opening and the eges
of the awning must be aligned as closely as possible with th einside face of the principle piers of the window
openings; the underside of the awning must be open; the lowest unframed portion of the awning shall be at least 7
feet above the sidewalk; awning shall project at an angle and be a length, size and slope which are proportional to
the size and height of the window or door; shall be only clad with water repellant canvas with a matte finish;
signs, such as lettering or graphics, are permitted to be painted on the awing skit only (no lettering or graphics
shall be permitted on the sloped portion of the awning; the size of the lettering shall be proportional to the skirt);
awning fabric shall consist of a solid color or vertical stripes that harmonize with the historic color palette of the
building; and that the restoration of the marble bulkhead will not cause the removal of significant historic fabric
that may have been added over time and will return these significant elements to their historic appearance. Based
on this and above findings, the drawings are marked approved with a perforated seal, and Certificate of
Appropriateness #08-7433 is being issued.

This permit is issued on the basis of the building and site conditions described in the application and disclosed
during the review process. By accepting this permit, the applicant agrees to notify the Commission if the actual
building or site conditions vary or if original or historic building fabric is discovered. The Commission reserves
the right to amend or revoke this permit, upon written notice to the applicant, in the event that the actual building
or site conditions are materially different from those described in the application or disclosed during the review
process.

All approved drawings are marked approved by the Commission with a perforated seal indicating the date of
approval. The work is limited to what is contained in the perforated documents. Other work or amendments to
this filing must be reviewed and approved separately. The applicant is hereby put on notice that performing or
maintaining any work not explicitly authorized by this permit may make the applicant liable for criminal and/or
civil penalties, including imprisonment and fines. This letter constitutes the permit; a copy must be prominently
displayed at the site while work is in progress. Please direct inquiries to Joselito Corpus.




PAGE 2
Issued: 3/26/08
DOCKET: 08-6265
Robert B. Tierney
Chair

PLEASE NOTE: PERFORATED DRAWINGS AND A COPY OF THIS PERMIT HAVE BEEN SENT TO:
Jerome S. Gillman Consulting

cc: William Neeley, Deputy Director of Preservation, LPC




PAGE 3
Issued: 3/26/08
DOCKET: 08-6265

Added to EveryBlock on April 25, 2008.

Other landmark building permits nearby