Landmark permit issued for 190 MERCER STREET, MANHATTAN in SOHO-CAST IRON

Source
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Updated
No longer updated

More about this section…

This is a landmark building permit with a issue date of March 21, 2007.

Landmark building permit details

Location 190 MERCER STREET, MANHATTAN
Issue date March 21, 2007
(?) COFA COFA 07-7107

Certificates of Appropriateness (COFAs) are issued by the landmarks commission when it approves such things as building construction, demolition and visible additions to historic property. The certificates require a public hearing and the entire process can take several months.

Docket 07-6031
Historic district Soho - Cast Iron
Landmark name N/A
Expiration date December 6, 2012
Text

Pursuant to Section 25-307 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Landmarks Preservation
Commission, at the Public Meeting of December 5, 2006, following the Public Hearing and Public Meeting of
July 11, 2006, and Public Meeting of November 14, 2006, voted to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
proposed work at the subject premises, as put forth in your application completed on June 15, 2006, as you were
informed in a Status Update Letter dated December 7, 2006.

The proposal, as approved, consists of alterations to the existing four bay storefront on the Mercer Street facade,
including the removal of modern brick, glass block, and louver infill at the three northern-most bays, and the
diamond plate sidewalk in front of the two southern-most bays; the relocation of the cast-iron vault light panel at
the sidewalk in front of the northern-most bay to the basement level, and the construction of a new painted metal
cellar stair in the areaway in front of the northern-most bay leading to a new cellar level storefront, with painted
metal railings at the stairs and flanking the opening; the installation of new storefront infill at the street level, set
between the cast iron column covers, and also at the cellar level, consisting of metal storefront framing painted
Sherwin Williams SW6013 "Chocolate Brown", with paired entrance doors at both levels, and back-painted glass
or clear glass display windows; scraping and repainting the historic cast iron elements "Chocolate Brown; the
restoration of the existing cast-iron and bullet glass stoop, and the installation of new tinted concrete paving in
front of the two southern-most bays, all as shown in photographs of the existing conditions and streetscape dated
May 9, 2006, and in undated drawings titled "Mercer Street Facade (Existing)", "Existing Partial Plan @ Street
Level", " "Mercer Street Facade (Proposed)", "Partial Plan at Cellar Level", "Section A-A", and "Vertical Section
- B", all prepared and presented at the Public Hearing and Public Meeting by Max Gordon Architects.

The proposal, as initially presented, included the removal of the existing cast-iron and bullet glass stoop and the
cast iron vault light panel, the installation of new painted metal steps leading up to a disply window at the
northern-most bay, new metal stairs leading from the south down to the basement entrance, and a single-leaf
ground level entrance in the second bay from the south, as shown in a photo-montage and drawings SK-1 through
SK-8, all dated July 21, 2006, prepared by Max Gordon Architects. The proposal, as modified for the November
14, 2006 Public Meeting, relocated the areaway entrance steps perpendicular to the facade of the building, as
shown in a photo-montage and undated drawings titled "Proposed Partial Plan at Street Level", "Partial Plan at
Cellar Level", "Mercer Street Facade (Existing)", "Mercer Street Facade (Proposed)", "Section A-A", and
"Vertical Section - C", all prepared by Max Gordon Architects

In reviewing this proposal, the Commission noted that the designation report describes 190 Mercer Street as a
Renaissance Revival style warehouse designed by John B. Snook and built in 1881-1882; and that style, scale,
materials, and details of the building are among the features that contribute to the special architectural and
historic character of the NoHo Historic District. .

With regard to this proposal, the Commission found that the removal of the infill at the Mercer Street elevation
will not result in the removal of significant historic fabric; that the historic cast-iron and bullet glass steps will be
retained and restored thereby preserving this significant historic feature; that the proposed storefront infill,
featuring black painted glass, clear glass and simple painted metal framing will be of a contemporary design that
will fit neatly within the historic cast-iron piers; that relocating the cast-iron vault light panel at the sidewalk to
the basement level will preserve this significant historic feature; that the construction of a new cellar stair at the
areaway at the northernmost bay will create access to the cellar space the least obtrusive manner; that the new
metal stairs will be harmonious with the existing cast-iron steps in terms of materials and details; that the height
and simple design of the railings will allow them to be an unobtrusive presence on the streetscape and will not
detract from the significant architectural features of the building; and that the proposed work will maintain the
special architectural and historic character of the building and the NoHo Historic District. Based on these
findings, the Commission determined the proposed work to be appropriate, and voted to approve it.

However, in voting to grant this approval, the Commission made its determination subject to the condition that
two final sets of signed and sealed Department of Building filing drawings showing the approved work be
submitted to the Commission for review.

On February 27, 2007, the Commission received the required two sets of signed and sealed drawings, including a
cover sheet dated February 1, 2007, N-1, N-2, and A-1 through A-4, all dated August 8, 2006, S-1, dated
February 20, 2006, S-2, S-4, P-1, and P-2, all dated March 2, 2006, and S-3, dated March 1, 2006, all prepared
and submitted by Max Gordon Architects.

Staff has reviewed these materials and finds that the design approved by the Commission has been maintained in
the filing drawings. Based on this and the approved findings, Certificate of Appropriateness 07-7107 is being
issued.

This permit is issued on the basis of the building and site conditions described in the application and disclosed
during the review process. By accepting this permit, the applicant agrees to notify the Commission if the actual
building or site conditions vary or if original or historic building fabric is discovered. The Commission reserves
the right to amend or revoke this permit, upon written notice to the applicant, in the event that the actual building
or site conditions are materially different from those described in the application or disclosed during the review
process.

All approved drawings are marked approved by the Commission with a perforated seal indicating the date of
approval. The work is limited to what is contained in the perforated documents. Other work or amendments to
this filing must be reviewed and approved separately. The applicant is hereby put on notice that performing or
maintaining any work not explicitly authorized by this permit may make the applicant liable for criminal and/or
civil penalties, including imprisonment and fines. This letter constitutes the permit; a copy must be prominently
displayed at the site while work is in progress. Please direct inquiries to John Graham.




PAGE 2
Issued: 3/21/07
DOCKET: 07-6031
Robert B. Tierney
Chair

PLEASE NOTE: PERFORATED DRAWINGS AND A COPY OF THIS PERMIT HAVE BEEN SENT TO:
Max Gordon, Max Gordon Architects

cc: Max Gordon Architects




PAGE 3
Issued: 3/21/07
DOCKET: 07-6031

Added to EveryBlock on January 16, 2008.

Comments

Have something to add? Post a comment — No HTML, please.

Please stay respectful and on-topic, and follow our comment policy.

Other landmark building permits nearby